Education about Research Resources Dissemination Scholarly Activity National Resources NLP Dashboard & Emails
Program leaders are encouraged to use institutional and national tools, as well as the implementation ideas collated by the leadership of the University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix GME programs and listed on these resource pages to support their improvement efforts.
Scholarly Activity 1: Education about Research
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
Education about research principles is provided as a sign of the program valuing the topic. |
Residents/fellows indicate that the education provided meets their needs. |
Residents/fellows apply their education around research principles to pursuing scholarly projects to investigate clinical questions. |
Program has evidence that the residents/fellows apply their knowledge of research principles through the implementation. |
The Program has evidence of improved patient level outcomes because of the regular integration of education about research to clinical questions. |
💡Idea 1: Education about research principles
Tools:
Implementation:
- Select relevant research education modules for your trainees and establish specific expectations for when they must be completed.
- Create a research rotation curriculum with a mix of modules required to demonstrate completion.
|
💡Idea 2: Trainees apply their education to pursuing scholarly projects
💡Idea 3: Trainees apply their knowledge of research principles through implementation (level 4)
Tools:
Implementation:
- Share key dates for abstract submissions in program announcements, emails.
- Create a program research day to have all trainees present their progress and project outcomes.
- Create a NI self-assessment form where trainees enter their project, outcomes, and reflections. Make completion required at a time no later than 6 months of graduation.
|
💡Idea 4: Improvement of patient level outcomes because of integration of education about research
Tools:
- Grand Rounds
- Journal Clubs
Implementation:
- Implementation and dissemination of regularly scheduled departmental Grand Rounds to highlight patient-related research outcomes.
- Training on critical appraisal of medical literature and how to conduct journal club with trainees (coming soon).
|
Scholarly Activity 2: Resources
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
Education is provided regarding existing resources to support the pursuit of scholarly questions. |
Residents/fellows can demonstrate how to access mentors and resources to support their scholarly questions. |
Residents/fellows utilize faculty mentors to pursue scholarly activity. |
Program tracks data about the use of faculty mentors and other resources to support the aims around scholarly activity. |
The Program has evidence of patient level outcomes improved because of the scholarly activity conducted by residents/fellows.
The program shares their model for supporting scholarly activity with other programs locally and nationally. |
💡Idea 1: Education regarding existing resources to support pursuit of scholarly questions
Tools:
Implementation:
- Incorporate resource list into the research curriculum.
- Development of Research Education Resources Website .
|
💡Idea 2: Access of mentors/resources (level 2) Utilization of faculty mentors
Tools:
Implementation:
- Host a specialty research mentoring panel at the start of the AY. Invite residents and mentors to a dinner discussion to facilitate pairing.
- Create a departmental list of research mentors.
- Trainee participation in research orientation for each dept/division at the beginning of the academic year.
- Connect with medical student scholarly projects to align faculty mentorship with multiple learners.
|
💡Idea 3: Program plans for transition of projects and partners trainees to ensure project completion in order to most effectively utilize resources
Tools:
- Neurosurgery "waterfall" support description
Implementation:
- Annually, match projects for graduating residents/fellows with current trainees to continue the work.
|
Scholarly Activity 3: Dissemination
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
The program promotes the value of dissemination by allowing time for presentations. |
Faculty mentor residents/fellows on the dissemination of their projects.
The majority of residents/fellows disseminate their projects through scholarly presentations within AZ. |
The majority of residents/fellows disseminate their projects through scholarly presentations outside of AZ or with publication. |
The program tracks scholarly output to implement changes in the process of mentoring and support. |
The Program has evidence of improved patient or system level outcomes because of the scholarly activity of residents/fellows. |
💡Idea 1: The program has established a standard expectation for dissemination
Implementation:
- Create a program standard for dissemination that aligns with program aims and curriculum.
- Define dissemination- local presentation (academic excellence day), national (society meeting), OR submission for publication.
- Review resident/fellow completion of dissemination expectations in the CCC reviews.
- Create an annual award for residents/fellows who significantly exceeded program expectations for dissemination or scholarly activity.
|
💡Idea 2: Residents/Fellow disseminate their projects through scholarly presentations or publication
Tools:
Implementation:
- Share key dates for abstract submissions in program announcements, emails.
- Create a program research day to have all trainees present their progress and project outcomes.
- Create a NI self-assessment form where trainees enter their project, outcomes, and reflections. Make completion required at a time no later than 6 months of graduation.
|
💡Idea 3: Annual review of scholarly output by the PEC
Tools:
- GME program milestone scholarly activity dashboard
- Ads faculty and trainee scholarly activity report
Implementation:
- Add to the PEC agenda- How many of our residents/fellows disseminate their research? Are their projects appropriately aligned, supported and sustained? How could the program improve the results?
- Trainee and faculty participation in local scholarly activity events (i.e. Academic Excellence Day, ROME Forum).
- Trainee and faculty participation in national scholarly activity events (i.e., AAMC, ACP).
|
Literature search
Scholarly Activity National Resources (update quarterly)
Do you have a tool to share or need more help? Contact @email